| Title |
: Technological Governance Regarding Life-Sustaining Technologies: The Limitations of RRI and Bioethics |
| Date |
: 2015. 12 |
| Journal title |
: Bioethics Policy Studies |
| Author |
: June-Seok Lee |
| Contact us |
: csts@khu.ac.kr |
| Abstract |
: Recently, as DNR prevails more and more in Korea, discussions regarding meaningless medical life-sustaining-treatment (LST) intensified. Some of the Supreme Court decisions are even discussed in mass media,
causing public debates. These cases tell us that, as life-sustaining medical technologies are highly developed, more sociological and policy-related analyses are needed on them. Firstly, this study will review 40 previous studies that analyze recent discussions in Korea about LST. Secondly, this study also shows that in bioethical and policy-related perspectives, governance about LST calls for a new implications regarding thanatoethics and thanatopolitics. In this new theoretical framework, death with dignity (DwD) can be understood as a process of giving back the thanatopower to the subject who chooses his way of ending based on his sound and free will. Thirdly, some of the new LST or resuscitation technologies such as automated external defibrillators (AED) are developed in RRI framework. However, if subjects themselves choose not to apply those technologies on them, as in the case of DNR (do not resuscitate) vows, meaning of developing such technologies are to be questioned. But currently such questions regarding the limitations of RRI are seldom asked. I argue that in order to properly apply RRI framework on existing technology, we also need to consider these points.
Key words: life-sustaining and resuscitation technologies, bioethics and thanatoethics, RRI (responsible research and innovation), thanatopower, thanatopolitics
Click the following link for downloading the article: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002072870 |
|
HOME > ACTIVITIES & OUTPUT > PUBLICATIONS
