PUBLICATIONS home HOME > ACTIVITIES & OUTPUT > PUBLICATIONS
TITLE The Landscape of Post-ELSI Methodologies: The Governance of Synthetic Biology and ʻUndone Social Scienceʼ
NAME °ü¸®ÀÚ HIT 1,468
LINK #1  http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/3648648 [1591]

Title : The Landscape of Post-ELSI Methodologies: The Governance of Synthetic Biology and ʻUndone Social Scienceʼ
Date : 2014. 12.
Journal title : Journal of Science and Technology Studies
Author : Taemin Woo and Buhm Soon Park
Contact us : csts@khu.ac.kr
Abstract : This paper explores what we call ʻthe problem of undone social scienceʼ by examining the lack of interests in the social, ethical, and legal issues of synthetic biology among social scientists in Korea. This new field of science, which has emerged in the twenty-first century with the promise of solving future problems of energy, food, and disease in the world, has also created a considerable degree of anxiety over the issues of bioethics, biosafety, and biosecurity. From its beginning, therefore, researchers of synthetic biology in Europe and the U.S. have sought to engage social scientists in their projects. Yet scientists and social scientists in Korea have shown no sign of working together to deal with both potential benefits and risks of synthetic biology. Why this silence? What strategic moves would be needed to overcome the structural barrier for their collaboration? Surveying the diverse methodologies developed during and after ELSI(ethical, legal, social implications) experiments, this paper aims to provide three suggestions that might make possible mutually profitable and continuously stimulating dialogues between the two worlds of science and social science: first, institutionalize the ELSI studies on any newly emerging science and technology of concern; second, explore diverse post-ELSI methodologies experimented elsewhere and develop ones that might be applicable best to the Korean situation; and third and perhaps most important, create an intellectual space and a lawful protection for social scientists to exercise their research freedom at the reasonable level and receive a fair review by their peers, not solely by funding agencies and scientific organizations.

Click the following link for downloading the article: http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/3648648